Has he played any four-day cricket?" was the somewhat disturbed reply from head mentor Chandika Hathurusingha yesterday when asked whether youthful quick bowler Taskin Ahmed may highlight in Bangladesh's Test squad for the arrangement against England.
In any case, he has played 10 five star recreations, and the mentor's point - accepting it is that Taskin is not part of the Test discussion - stands insofar that he has played the remainder of those three-and-a-half years back.
Presently if we somehow managed to nitpick and split hairs we would need to ask whether Hathurusingha was unconscious that Taskin had played five star cricket some time recently. In the event that that appears to be impossible, is it conceivable that he was over-stressing an indicate commute home Taskin ought not play Tests? Assuming this is the case, why?
"In the event that you haven't played four-day cricket in all your years, standing four days on the field and knocking down some pins 15 overs is altogether new for him. I would prefer not to devastate some individual's profession," the mentor said, finishing examination of Taskin's Test accreditations for the present.
It is not as though the theory encompassing Taskin's part has risen out of nowhere. It has been scarcely two days since it was reported that he would play in the second two-day warm-up match against an England XI beginning today. Around then there was much discuss what a critical prospect Taskin is for longer-variant cricket.
To be reasonable there was no dialog, when Taskin's inclusion in the visit match was declared, about him being fit or prepared for the Test beginning on Thursday, yet it appeared the entryway was not totally close for the second Test in Dhaka, with a specific hopefulness being communicated about his preparation for the crease agreeable pitches of New Zealand.
It appeared a legitimate way to seek after on the grounds that without the harmed Mustafizur Rahman and Mashrafe Bin Mortaza, the supernatural yet damage inclined pacer whose Test days appear to be over, Bangladesh's more extended form pace saves bear an alarmingly infertile look. However the question inspired a reply as solid as 'I would prefer not to obliterate someone's profession.
One perspective that appears to have been lost in the rapture of these shores seeing global cricket after quite a while is the redone choice board, in which the mentor, group administrator and cricket operations executive frame a six-man board alongside the three-man choice board. This dissension between the obvious reserving of Taskin for future Tests and the mentor's wholesale dismissal of the idea is an inquisitive one. As an individual from the procedure, would he say he was not gathering to the choice?
After Hathurusingha's articulations yesterday, the partisan loyalty turned into that Taskin was never considered for this arrangement. All were singing from similar songbook; the question that will stay unanswered until further notice, it appears, is whose songbook that is.
In any case, he has played 10 five star recreations, and the mentor's point - accepting it is that Taskin is not part of the Test discussion - stands insofar that he has played the remainder of those three-and-a-half years back.
Presently if we somehow managed to nitpick and split hairs we would need to ask whether Hathurusingha was unconscious that Taskin had played five star cricket some time recently. In the event that that appears to be impossible, is it conceivable that he was over-stressing an indicate commute home Taskin ought not play Tests? Assuming this is the case, why?
"In the event that you haven't played four-day cricket in all your years, standing four days on the field and knocking down some pins 15 overs is altogether new for him. I would prefer not to devastate some individual's profession," the mentor said, finishing examination of Taskin's Test accreditations for the present.
It is not as though the theory encompassing Taskin's part has risen out of nowhere. It has been scarcely two days since it was reported that he would play in the second two-day warm-up match against an England XI beginning today. Around then there was much discuss what a critical prospect Taskin is for longer-variant cricket.
To be reasonable there was no dialog, when Taskin's inclusion in the visit match was declared, about him being fit or prepared for the Test beginning on Thursday, yet it appeared the entryway was not totally close for the second Test in Dhaka, with a specific hopefulness being communicated about his preparation for the crease agreeable pitches of New Zealand.
It appeared a legitimate way to seek after on the grounds that without the harmed Mustafizur Rahman and Mashrafe Bin Mortaza, the supernatural yet damage inclined pacer whose Test days appear to be over, Bangladesh's more extended form pace saves bear an alarmingly infertile look. However the question inspired a reply as solid as 'I would prefer not to obliterate someone's profession.
One perspective that appears to have been lost in the rapture of these shores seeing global cricket after quite a while is the redone choice board, in which the mentor, group administrator and cricket operations executive frame a six-man board alongside the three-man choice board. This dissension between the obvious reserving of Taskin for future Tests and the mentor's wholesale dismissal of the idea is an inquisitive one. As an individual from the procedure, would he say he was not gathering to the choice?
After Hathurusingha's articulations yesterday, the partisan loyalty turned into that Taskin was never considered for this arrangement. All were singing from similar songbook; the question that will stay unanswered until further notice, it appears, is whose songbook that is.
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন